Entries Tagged as ''

Inge Lotz Murder: The Civil Suit – Fred on the stand

Fred was on the stand yesterday describing the final hours he saw Inge.

His story is pretty much the same as during the trial, where he spoke about their last night together, his problems with his brother and the letters Inge gave him the next day.

He also spoke about his day at Old Mutual in Pinelands and how he was there until after 6pm. This included the so-called afternoon “window period” in which the State claimed in the criminal trial that he would have had opportunity to drive to Stellenbosch and commit the crime.

For me personally, this “window period” has never been properly explored. As I pointed out in the original trial, there is a couple hours window that are not accounted for.

I don’t think that Fred could have done the whole trip, murdered Inge, cleaned up, then gone back to work all composed as the window is very small. However this is still the one little detail which provides a niggle of doubt and I wish that it was addressed properly.

Many people I have spoken to are pretty supportive of Fred now. Most are talking about how the cops and prosecutors lied.

“The scary thing is that there seems to be no oversight of the prosecution beforehand that would have stopped this. Cope lie , proscutors can see they lie and know they will be found out to be lying yet still go ahead …. the logic is childish, never mind the bigger point that the whole lot of them are so morally bankrupt they wanted this guy in jail when they knew he did not do it” said one commenter.

When watching the developments surrounding the Anni Dewani murder case, you can see the cops making suggestions that her husband Shrien was involved – even though there is no evidence pointing there as of yet. Is this the same kind of thing?

One has to wonder how many innocent people are languishing in prison because of lying cops and prosecuters who do not expose the lies. One also has to wonder whether people like Agliotti are in the same ship.

Muti This

Hawkes to launch new probe into Inge Lotz murder

Probably as a direct result of the current lawsuit by Fred van der Vyver against the police and prosecutors, it has been announced that the Hawks will be looking into the case.

Prof Jan Lotz has confirmed that he has been informed by the police commissioner that the matter had been referred to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations in Pretoria.

“It was my impression that there was no real action by police to bring this matter to a close.” he told reporters. “I am convinced that this was a premeditated murder, one that was well-planned and committed by someone close to her”.

“We believe it was probably one of five people, and I believe that all five of those people were at Inge’s funeral. What is needed, is that someone should sit down and really apply themselves to chasing the guilty party from his hiding place.”

“Whatever comes out that can help to identify the murderer, will give the answer and create the space for us and for Fred to go on with our lives.”

Let us hope and pray that the Hawks will investigate the case properly and bring the perpetrator to justice!

Muti This

Happy World Toilet Day!

November 19th is World Toilet Day. A day to celebrate the importance of sanitation and raise awareness for the 2.6 billion people (nearly half of the world’s population) who don’t have access to toilets and proper sanitation.

Be informed about the lack of sanitation in the world. The facts are staggering:

2.6 billion people worldwide are without access to proper sanitation, which risks their health, strips their dignity, and kills 1.8 million people, mostly children, a year.

Diarrheal diseases kill five times as many children in the developing world as HIV/AIDS.

That’s 5,000 children DYING EVERY SINGLE DAY.

Not only that, but the disease kills more children than either malaria or AIDS, stunts growth, and forces millions – adults and children alike – to spend weeks at a time off work or school, which hits both a country’s economy and its citizens’ chances of a better future. The majority of the illness in the world is caused by fecal matter.

Lack of sanitation is the world’s biggest cause of infection.

One gram of feces can contain 10 million viruses, one million bacteria, 1,000 parasite cysts and 100 parasite eggs.

Safe disposal of children’s feces leads to a reduction of nearly 40% in childhood diarrhea.

For more info: World Toilet Day

Have a great day!!

Muti This

Inge Lotz Murder: SMS tormenter targets Lotz’s mother

Just as the civil suit brought by Fred van der Vyver gets underway, we hear that Juanita Lotz is being targeted by a sick individual.

Prof Jan Lotz said to reporters:

“It began in October last year, then abated for a while, and has now begun again.

“The messages effectively say that I was not Inge’s father, and that (deleted) was her father.

“It starts in the middle of the night and all times of the morning. To say that to a woman is probably going as low as you potentially could go.”

“You feel you’re dealing with something so appalling, so threatening… that it’s probably better to stay out of its way.”

The police had been alerted and he believed they knew the identity of the sender, but as of yet, no one had been arrested. How surprising!

But wait, it gets worse! Sources in the police and the Director of Public Prosecutions’ office differed as to whether the case was still being investigated….

It is disgusting that the police and prosecutors are not acting on this! Mrs Lotz does not deserve to be targeted by this sick person and it is the DUTY of the police to bring this individual to book.

In fact, in light of the current court case, they should be bending over backwards to catch the person.

The Lotz family will not be attending the civil court. Prof Lotz has said that he is not involved in the proceedings.

He was critical of the police saying:

“My wife and I spent 10 months in the (Western) Cape High Court… so it’s a place we wouldn’t want to visit again

“But the only way that this thing can be brought to a final conclusion, for Fred and ourselves, is for the killer to be found. It has to happen.

“We’ve waited for five years, and I’m sorry to be critical, but what we have experienced is total inactivity from the SAPS. I’m seeing nothing – no committed effort to get to the bottom of this.

“As far as my wife and I are concerned, the last five years have been frozen in time. It’s impossible to go on like this – but we will only be able to move on when the killer is found.”

Police – get of your @#$%$ asses and actually DO something about this!

Muti This

Inge Lotz Murder: The Civil Suit – Prof Gert Saayman and the hammer

Yesterday saw Prof Gert Saayman, of the University of Pretoria testifying in the civil suit of Fred van der Vyver against the state and police.

Prof Saayman testified that the ornamental hammer which police say was the murder weapon was ‘unlikely’ to have been the weapon to murder Inge Lotz.

He told the court that the hammer had a striking surface only 22mm across, whereas the wounds to Inge’s skull were clearly much larger than this.

He went on to say that in his opinion, the wounds were rather caused by a rigid “linear or cylindrical” object.

Asked by Van der Vyver’s advocte Dup de Bruyn about the likelihood “on the probabilities” of the hammer being the murder weapon, he said: “No. Not used.”

Although this testimony is not yet as electrifying as Bodziak’s testimony, we could still hear more; particularly on the experiments the police conducted on the pig carcass.

At this point, one has to really wonder why the state did not settle this matter out of court. Surely they do not want their incompetance in this case to be highlighted once again?

The case continues.

Muti This

Inge Lotz Murder: The Civil Suit – William Bodziak

William (Bill) Bodziak took the stand to lash out at the police and their footprint evidence, lies they told and false reports written to implicate Fred van der Vyver as the suspect.

He testified that Superintendent Bruce Bartholomew flew to Florida in June 2006 to get his opinion on a bloodstain that Bartholomew had matched to a sports shoe belonging to Van der Vyver.

He tetified that the ‘evidence’ brought over by Bartholomew was woefully inadequate for him to form any opinion.

Asked by advocate Kosie Olivier whether there could have been a misunderstanding during the Florida consultation, Bodziak said he did not know how this was possible, because they had “over and over again” gone over the fact that there were no features in the mark that could be linked to the shoe.

He sent Bartholomew away to do further tests in south Africa.

Bartholomew arrived with the footwear and two CDs which contained the photographs of the blood marking and particularly the heel area of the shoe which Bartholomew said contained “sand grains” , they were not scaled and were only “3×5 inches (7,5cm to 12,5cm) big”.

“Bartholomew alleged there were three small pieces of debris (sand) lodged in the shoe and I explained to him that the debris was too deep in the shoe to make a marking,” said Bodziak, adding that it was these grains of sand that Bartholomew had theorised as one of the main links between the marking in the blood stain and the shoe.

Bartholomew believed that the “three white spots” in the blood had been made by the sand which was lodged in a 5mm deep groove, he said.
[Read more →]

Muti This

Inge Lotz Murder: The Civil Suit – opening

I do apologise for not writing earlier. I was out of the country and had limited access to the net, but I am back!

The long awaited ‘second trial’ in the Inge Lotz case is well underway. I say ‘second trial’ because most of us who have followed the case will be scrutinising everything said.

Will the spotlight on the police investigators and prosecution team give us further clues to the truth?

One thing that is blatantly obvious is that after 5 years of police inaction, we can infer that they still believe that Fred was their man. Is this mindset jeapardising any possibility of the real killer being caught?

“Prosecutors in the Inge Lotz trial were “deliberately deceived” by police investigating her case, who “withheld information” from them that would have stopped the prosecution of Lotz’s boyfriend, Fred van der Vyver.” according to Dup de Bruyn, the advocate for Fred van der Vyver on the opening day of the civil case for damages amounting to about R46 million.

“(Police) willfully made statements which were willfully false in material respects but for which the prosecution would not have been undertaken.”

Police had also “willfully made inadequate inquiries or none at all when the questions and inquiries cried out for investigation”.

“(They) dishonestly prejudiced the judgment of the prosecuting authority and in so doing, precluded an unfettered exercise of the prosecuting authority’s discretion,” De Bruyn said.

In the coming weeks, four witnesses will be called by the van der Vyver team:
[Read more →]

Muti This